Dieses Blog durchsuchen

Mittwoch, 3. April 2013

Britische Klassen-Studie zeigt auf: Keine Dreiklassengesellschaft mehr

... sondern eine Siebenklassengesellschaft



Bild rechts:
Reflektion ueber "das obere Drittel der mittleren Unterschicht"

Gefunden auf
http://www.notesofberlin.com/2012/04/fur-das-obere-drittel-der-mittleren.html






Danke, MARTIN !


  
Nachtrag 8. April 2013
Ich muss leider um Geduld bitten – oder, besser noch, um Mithilfe -, bis eine Zusammenfassung auf Deutsch vorliegt. Selbst komme ich im Moment nicht dazu, und die Internet-Suche nach “Siebenklassengesellschaft” ergibt nur wenige Treffer, die dann wieder auf englischsprachige Quellen fuehren; z.B.
LSE in Germany‏@lsegermany4 Apr
https://twitter.com/lsegermany
“UK Umfrage: Die Sieben-Klassen Gesellschaft - eine neue Einteilung der Gesellschaftsschichten” verweist auf
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2013/04/NewClassSystem.aspx

Enttaeuschend: Google findet zwar einen Link zu einem relevanten Beitrag vom Hessischen Rundfunk,
Steuerparadiese Jersey und Guernsey - Hessischer Rundfunk
www.hr-online.de › 2 days ago – Sieben-Klassengesellschaft in Großbritannien Großbritannien ist angeblich keine Drei-Klassengesellschaft mehr, sondern weist jetzt sieben ...
 
aber leider heisst es dann unter dem angegebenen Link
http://www.hr-online.de/website/radio/hr-info/index.jsp?rubrik=80089&key=standard_document_48004559 
"Seite nicht gefunden - Die gewünschte Seite ist unter dieser Adresse nicht mehr erreichbar. Möglicherweise stimmt der Link nicht mehr, oder die Seite ist inzwischen vom Server gelöscht. ..."
______________

 
Trotzdem lasse ich den Post jetzt stehen; es gibt ja auch noch Google-Uebersetzungen.


Die zuerst gefundene Quelle war
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/now-there-are-seven-social-classes-1

  
Updated: 03 April 2013 08:30 | By pa.press.net

Now there are seven social classes



The British public no longer fit in to just three social classes, a major new study has concluded.
Instead the findings suggest people are now divided into seven different classes based on economic, social and cultural measures, the BBC reported.
More than 160,000 people took part in the Great British Class Survey, the largest of its kind in the UK.
The results prompted researchers to dismiss the established upper class, middle class and working class system, traditionally defined by occupation, wealth and education, as "too simplistic".
The new classes range from the privileged "elite" to the deprived "precariat", assessing income, savings, house value and social capital - the number and status of people that someone knows.
The research was carried out by Mike Savage from the London School of Economics and Fiona Devine from the University of Manchester with the help of BBC Lab UK.
Professor Devine said: "It shows us there is still a top and a bottom, at the top we still have an elite of very wealthy people and at the bottom the poor, with very little social and cultural engagement."
In the middle of the two extremes are the established middle class, the second wealthiest group, followed by the technical middle class, a small, prosperous new class group which scores low for social and cultural capital.
Next down the line are the new affluent workers, a young class group which is socially and culturally active, with middling levels of economic capital, and the traditional working class, who score low on capital but are not "completely deprived".
Ahead of the poorest in society are the emergent service workers, a new, young, urban group which is relatively poor but has high social and cultural capital.



Na ja, wie man’s eben zusammenfasst. So hatten gut 10.000 Teilnehmer an einem Leser-Survey sich am Nachmittag selbst eingestuft:

Elite (highest)                              5 %      478 votes
Established middle class           11 %    1,216 votes
Technical middle class              17 %     1,799 votes
New affluent workers                  9 %       960 votes
Traditional working class          45 %     4,787 votes
Emergent service workers           3 %       312 votes
Precarious proletariat (lowest)   10 %     1,067 votes

Total responses: 10,619
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.

http://uk.msn.com/?pc=UP21&ocid=UP21DHP&dt=040113&ar=1



___________



“Sinkende Realloehne sind Ausdruck struktureller Verbesserungen”

Zum “Reichstumsbericht” der Bundesregierung
Heute-Show 08.03.2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t6RcDIMbXk


__________


Sarrazin:
Unterschichtgeburten fuellen die Schulen

http://www.news.de/fotostrecke/850690671/spricht-er-klartext-oder-ist-er-ein-verbaler-brandstifter/15/

... und ich dachte immer, Kinder wuerden die Schulen fuellen








________

Nachtrag:


"Die soziopolitischen Konsequenzen dieser „deutlich voneinander abgehobenen, häufig durch latente oder offene Antagonismen" geprägten sozialen Differenzierung der „Unter"-Schichten sind bislang wissenschaftlich kaum thematisiert worden."

Siehe
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2013/12/rassenhygiene-als-sozialistisches.html
Eingestellt von um
Labels: , ,

9 Kommentare:

  1. guttmensch wannabe3. April 2013 um 17:12

    Erfasst wurde zusaetzlich zu den finanziellen Faktoren - Einkommen, Ersparnisse, Haus- und Grundbesitz - auch das "soziale Kapital": Anzahl und Status der Leute, die einer kennt.

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. guttmensch wannabe11. April 2013 um 03:21

    Pensionierter Bank-Boss bietet an, seine Ritterwuerde zurueck zu geben und auf 30 % seiner Pension von £580,000 im Jahr zu verzichten, nachdem sich herausgestellt hat, dass seine Strategie zum Kollaps der Bank gefuehrt hat.
    Ruehrend.

    Updated: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 | By pa.press.net
    Ex-bank boss to hand back honour

    "Former HBOS chief executive Sir James Crosby said he wanted to be stripped of his knighthood and would give up 30% of his £580,000 a year pension after last week's scathing report into the bank's collapse."

    http://money.uk.msn.com/ex-bank-boss-to-hand-back-honour-2

    AntwortenLöschen
  3. guttmensch wannabe2. Mai 2015 um 10:43

    Have your say

    Hurra, das Volk ist aufgefordert. sich an der Debatte der wirklich wichtigen Themen zu beteiligen! - Bringen Sie Ihre Stimme ein: Wird das Baby von Kate und William ein Junge oder ein Mädchen?

    Live blog: Kate Middleton in labor
    If the baby is a girl, she will be the highest-ranking female in line to the throne. Have your say: Will it be a boy or a girl? »

    Heute ganz oben auf Yahoo
    Royal Labour Live Blog:
    http://yahoonewsuk.tumblr.com/royal-baby/

    AntwortenLöschen
  4. guttmensch wannabe6. September 2015 um 11:59

    Vermögensverteilung: Deutschland ist gespalten - in Superreiche und den Rest

    Von Nicolai Kwasniewski

    In keinem Land Europas ist der Reichtum so ungleich verteilt wie in Deutschland. Eine neue Untersuchung zeigt: Allein das reichste Prozent besitzt ein Drittel des gesamten Privatvermögens. In Spanien oder Frankreich ist der Wohlstand gleichmäßiger verteilt. ...

    http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/vermoegen-sind-in-deutschland-sehr-ungleich-verteilt-a-1051286.html

    AntwortenLöschen
  5. guttmensch wannabe14. September 2015 um 02:50

    Reiche Leute sind reich, weil sie Ärmel hochkrempeln statt klagen. Aha.

    Much of what separates wealthy people from average people is mental — rich people simply think, act, and make choices differently than the rest of us.

    In "Secrets of the Millionaire Mind," author and self-made millionaire T. Harv Eker identifies a seemingly harmless daily habit average people engage in that the rich refuse to: complaining.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/self-made-millionaire-says-seemingly-163000246.html

    AntwortenLöschen
  6. guttmensch wannabe19. September 2015 um 06:23

    Australian economy
    Grogonomics
    19 Sep 2015

    As the 'rising tide' of living standards starts to ebb, the poorest will go under
    Greg Jericho

    Natsem says lower economic growth over the next decade and welfare changes mean living standards won’t rise as fast – and they’ll actually fall for the poorest. ...

    Greg writes on economics for Guardian Australia and is the author of the celebrated Grogs Gamut blog. He is a former public servant and author of the book The Rise of the Fifth Estate: Social Media and Blogging in Australian Politics

    http://www.theguardian.com/profile/greg-jericho

    AntwortenLöschen
  7. Anonym8. August 2016 um 07:50

    The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen
    Christine Sypnowich

    Abstract
    This collection pays tribute to the highly influential work of Professor G.A. Cohen in the field of egalitarian political philosophy. He has a significant body of work spanning issues of Marxism and distributive justice, consistently characterized by original ideas and ingenious arguments. The volume includes essays on a number of significant topics, reflecting the wide-ranging themes of Professor Cohen’s work, but united in their concern for questions of social justice, pluralism, equality, and moral duty.

    Keywords: equality, justice, freedom, incentives, self-ownership, liberalism, rights, duty, democracy, property

    Bibliographic Information
    Print publication date: 2006

    Contents

    Introduction: G. A. Cohen's Egalitarian Conscience
    Christine Sypnowich

    1 Left‐Liberalism Revisited
    Will Kymlicka

    2 Throwing a Veil Over Equality: Equality and Hypocrisy in the Revolutionary Era
    Will Kymlicka

    3
    Derek Parfit

    4 Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality
    T. M. Scanlon

    5 Self‐Ownership and Conscription
    Hillel Steiner

    6 Is the Basic Structure Basic?
    Samuel Scheffler

    7. Choice and Incentive Inequality
    Susan Hurley

    8 Mr. Morgan's Yacht
    Jeremy Waldron

    9 Begging
    Christine Sypnowich

    10
    John E. Roemer

    11 Is there a Human Right to Democracy?
    Joshua Cohen

    AntwortenLöschen
    Antworten
    1. Anonym8. August 2016 um 07:51

      http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199281688.001.0001/acprof-9780199281688

      Löschen
  8. guttmensch wannabe20. Oktober 2018 um 00:35

    The myth of meritocracy: who really gets what they deserve?

    Sorting people by ‘merit’ will do nothing to fix inequality. By Kwame Anthony Appiah

    19 Oct 2018

    Michael Young was an inconvenient child. His father, an Australian, was a musician and music critic, and his mother, who grew up in Ireland, was a painter of a bohemian bent. They were hard-up, distractible and frequently on the outs with each other. Michael, born in 1915 in Manchester, soon found that neither had much time for him. Once when his parents had seemingly forgotten his birthday, he imagined that he was in for a big end-of-day surprise. But no, they really had forgotten his birthday, which was no surprise at all. He overheard his parents talk about putting him up for adoption and, by his own account, never fully shed his fear of abandonment.

    Everything changed for him when, at the age of 14, he was sent to an experimental boarding school at Dartington Hall in Devon. It was the creation of the great progressive philanthropists Leonard and Dorothy Elmhirst, and it sought to change society by changing souls. There it was as if he had been put up for adoption, because the Elmhirsts treated him as a son, encouraging and supporting him for the rest of their lives. Suddenly he was a member of the transnational elite: dining with President Roosevelt, listening in on a conversation between Leonard and Henry Ford.

    Young, who has been called the greatest practical sociologist of the past century, pioneered the modern scientific exploration of the social lives of the English working class. He did not just aim to study class, though; he aimed to ameliorate the damage he believed it could do. The Dartington ideal was about the cultivation of personality and aptitudes whatever form they took, and the British class structure plainly impeded this ideal. ...

    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/oct/19/the-myth-of-meritocracy-who-really-gets-what-they-deserve

    AntwortenLöschen

Abonnieren Kommentare zum Post (Atom)