Dieses Blog durchsuchen

Montag, 22. April 2013

Freie Rede, Schutz vor rassistischer Diskriminierung - wie geht die Balance?


Ein UN-Gremium wirft dem SPD-Politiker [Thilo Sarrazin] Anstiftung zu „rassistischer Diskriminierung“ vor. Er habe „die Ideologie rassischer Überlegenheit“ verbreitet.

von Andreas Zumach   taz.de  17.04.2013

GENF taz | Mit der Niederschlagung einer Klage wegen volksverhetzender Äußerungen des ehemaligen Bundesbankers und Berliner Wirtschaftssenators Thilo Sarrazin hat Deutschland gegen die Antirassismuskonvention der UNO verstoßen. Zu diesem Urteil gelangte der ständige Ausschuss zur Überwachung dieser Konvention (Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, CERD) in Genf jetzt nach einer über dreijährigen Untersuchung.
In dem Interview hatte Sarrazin behauptet, ein Großteil der in Berlin lebenden TürkInnen habe „keine produktive Funktion“ außer für den Obst- und Gemüsehandel. Sie seien „weder fähig noch willens“ zur Integration und hielten an einer kollektiven, traditionellen und aggressiven Mentalität fest. Sarrazin erklärte, die Türken würden Deutschland mittels ihrer höheren Geburtenrate erobern, so wie die Kosovaren das Kosovo. Er hätte nichts dagegen, wenn es sich nicht um Türken, sondern um osteuropäische Juden handeln würde, die einen 15 Prozent höheren Intelligenzquotienten als die Deutschen hätten.

Mit diesen Aussagen habe Sarrazin „die Ideologie rassischer Überlegenheit und von Rassenhass verbreitet“ und zu „rassistischer Diskriminierung angestiftet“, stellte das CERD fest.  
Ebendies hatte die Berliner Staatsanwaltschaft verneint und in Sarrazins Äußerungen keine Gefährdung des öffentlichen Friedens erkennen wollen. Mit dieser Entscheidung „hat Deutschland seine Verpflichtung aus der Antirassismuskonvention verletzt, eine eventuelle Gefährdung des öffentlichen Friedens effektiv zu untersuchen“, moniert der UN-Ausschuss. Die nationale Gesetzgebung Deutschlands entspreche bislang nicht den völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtungen aus der Antirassismuskonvention.

Der CERD empfiehlt Deutschland, „seine Politik und Verfahren mit Blick auf die Verfolgung mutmaßlicher rassendiskriminierender Äußerungen sowie der Behauptung rassischer Überlegenheit zu überprüfen“ und in Einklang zu bringen mit den Bestimmungen der UNO-Konvention.


____




___

Internationales Übereinkommen zur Beseitigung jeder Form von Rassendiskriminierung
vom 7. März 1966 (BGBl. 1969 II S. 961)
http://www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF-Dateien/Pakte_Konventionen/ICERD/icerd_de.pdf



Nicht Sarrazins Traum:
I have a dream - Ich habe einen Traum
Martin Luther King in Washington, 1963
http://www.planet-wissen.de/politik_geschichte/persoenlichkeiten/martin_luther_king/buergerrechtsbewegung.jsp

Freitag, 19. April 2013

Boston Marathon Attentat

Nachtrag 21.04.2013

Dzhokhar Tsernaev/ Dschochar Zarnajew ist inzwischen gefasst.
Einzelheiten siehe z.B. RP Online
http://www.rp-online.de/panorama/ausland/erfolg-bei-terroristenjagd-verdeckt-pannen-1.3344731

Bemerkenswert auf RP Online (aber nicht nur dort):
Der Marathon-Anschlag wurde als “der erste Anschlag seit 9/11” bezeichnet.
Siehe Artikel Die Schockwirkung der Explosionen beim Marathon: Boston – der erste Anschlag seit 9/11 von FRANK HERRMANN 16.04.2013
http://www.rp-online.de/panorama/ausland/boston-der-erste-anschlag-seit-9-11-1.3335406

In Wirklichkeit hat es in den USA seit 9/11 etliche Anschlaege (in einer dem Marathon-Anschlag vergleichbaren Groessenordnung) gegeben; z.B. den Anschlag auf die Abgeordnete Gabrielle Gifford und Teilnehmer ihrer Veranstaltung in Tucson, Arizona 2011, Anschlaege auf Besucher eines Sikh-Tempels in Wisconsin und auf Kino-Besucher in Aurora, Colorado, jeweils 2012.
http://zettelmaus.blogspot.de/2012/08/die-waffe-aus-dem-shooter-shop.html; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Aurora_shooting

Der Unterschied besteht darin, dass es sich bei den anderen Anschlaegen nicht um muslimische Attentaeter gehandelt hatte, sondern z.T. um Rechtsextremisten. Bei den Bruedern Tsernaev/ Zarnajew, die tschetschenischer Herkunft sind, besteht offenbar ein islamistischer Hintergrund.

_______


10000 Polizisten machen Jagd auf Marathon-Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
Basellandschaftliche Zeitung

Boston 19. April 2013

http://www.basellandschaftlichezeitung.ch/ausland/10000-polizisten-machen-jagd-auf-marathon-bomber-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-126425243

10000 Polizisten machen Jagd auf Marathon-Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Die Suche nach dem zweiten Verdächtigen des Attentats von Boston läuft auf
Hochtouren. Im Auto kommt niemand mehr aus Watertown raus oder in die Stadt
rein. Der öffentliche Verkehr in der Region wurde eingestellt.


13.38 Uhr: Der Bruder von Dzhokhar wurde nicht erschossen, sondern starb, weil
der Sprengsatz an seinem Körper explodierte. Noch ist unklar, ob er den
Sprengsatz zünden wollte oder ob dieser unabsichtlich explodierte.

13.27 Uhr: Die Polizei bestätigt: Gesucht wird der 19-jährige Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
Sein Name ist auf einer Stipendien-Liste der Stadt Cambridge aus dem Jahr 2011.

13.14 Uhr: Bei dem flüchtigen Attentäter soll es sich um den Tschetschenen
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev handeln, dies berichten die Nachrichtenagentur AP und NBC
übereinstimmend.

13.00 Uhr: Die beiden Verdächtigen könnten Brüder sein. NBC Boston meldet, dass
es sich um Tschetschen handeln soll. Die beiden sollen schon über ein Jahr in
Cambridge leben. Die Brüder seien 19 und 20 Jahre alt und hätten davor in der
Türkei gelebt. Zuvor kursierten jedoch andere Namen der zwei Verdächtigen.

...

Mittwoch, 3. April 2013

Britische Klassen-Studie zeigt auf: Keine Dreiklassengesellschaft mehr

... sondern eine Siebenklassengesellschaft



Bild rechts:
Reflektion ueber "das obere Drittel der mittleren Unterschicht"

Gefunden auf
http://www.notesofberlin.com/2012/04/fur-das-obere-drittel-der-mittleren.html






Danke, MARTIN !


  
Nachtrag 8. April 2013
Ich muss leider um Geduld bitten – oder, besser noch, um Mithilfe -, bis eine Zusammenfassung auf Deutsch vorliegt. Selbst komme ich im Moment nicht dazu, und die Internet-Suche nach “Siebenklassengesellschaft” ergibt nur wenige Treffer, die dann wieder auf englischsprachige Quellen fuehren; z.B.
“UK Umfrage: Die Sieben-Klassen Gesellschaft - eine neue Einteilung der Gesellschaftsschichten” verweist auf
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2013/04/NewClassSystem.aspx

Enttaeuschend: Google findet zwar einen Link zu einem relevanten Beitrag vom Hessischen Rundfunk,
Steuerparadiese Jersey und Guernsey - Hessischer Rundfunk
www.hr-online.de › 2 days ago – Sieben-Klassengesellschaft in Großbritannien Großbritannien ist angeblich keine Drei-Klassengesellschaft mehr, sondern weist jetzt sieben ...
 
aber leider heisst es dann unter dem angegebenen Link
http://www.hr-online.de/website/radio/hr-info/index.jsp?rubrik=80089&key=standard_document_48004559 
"
Seite nicht gefunden - Die gewünschte Seite ist unter dieser Adresse nicht mehr erreichbar. Möglicherweise stimmt der Link nicht mehr, oder die Seite ist inzwischen vom Server gelöscht. ..."

______________

 
Trotzdem lasse ich den Post jetzt stehen; es gibt ja auch noch Google-Uebersetzungen.


Die zuerst gefundene Quelle war
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/now-there-are-seven-social-classes-1

  
Updated: 03 April 2013 08:30 | By pa.press.net

Now there are seven social classes



The British public no longer fit in to just three social classes, a major new study has concluded.
Instead the findings suggest people are now divided into seven different classes based on economic, social and cultural measures, the BBC reported.
More than 160,000 people took part in the Great British Class Survey, the largest of its kind in the UK.
The results prompted researchers to dismiss the established upper class, middle class and working class system, traditionally defined by occupation, wealth and education, as "too simplistic".
The new classes range from the privileged "elite" to the deprived "precariat", assessing income, savings, house value and social capital - the number and status of people that someone knows.
The research was carried out by Mike Savage from the London School of Economics and Fiona Devine from the University of Manchester with the help of BBC Lab UK.
Professor Devine said: "It shows us there is still a top and a bottom, at the top we still have an elite of very wealthy people and at the bottom the poor, with very little social and cultural engagement."
In the middle of the two extremes are the established middle class, the second wealthiest group, followed by the technical middle class, a small, prosperous new class group which scores low for social and cultural capital.
Next down the line are the new affluent workers, a young class group which is socially and culturally active, with middling levels of economic capital, and the traditional working class, who score low on capital but are not "completely deprived".
Ahead of the poorest in society are the emergent service workers, a new, young, urban group which is relatively poor but has high social and cultural capital.



Na ja, wie man’s eben zusammenfasst. So hatten gut 10.000 Teilnehmer an einem Leser-Survey sich am Nachmittag selbst eingestuft:

Elite (highest)                              5 %      478 votes
Established middle class           11 %    1,216 votes
Technical middle class              17 %     1,799 votes
New affluent workers                  9 %       960 votes
Traditional working class          45 %     4,787 votes
Emergent service workers           3 %       312 votes
Precarious proletariat (lowest)   10 %     1,067 votes

Total responses: 10,619
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.

http://uk.msn.com/?pc=UP21&ocid=UP21DHP&dt=040113&ar=1



___________



“Sinkende Realloehne sind Ausdruck struktureller Verbesserungen”

Zum “Reichstumsbericht” der Bundesregierung
Heute-Show 08.03.2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t6RcDIMbXk


__________


Sarrazin:
Unterschichtgeburten fuellen die Schulen

http://www.news.de/fotostrecke/850690671/spricht-er-klartext-oder-ist-er-ein-verbaler-brandstifter/15/

... und ich dachte immer, Kinder wuerden die Schulen fuellen








________

Nachtrag:


"Die soziopolitischen Konsequenzen dieser „deutlich voneinander abgehobenen, häufig durch latente oder offene Antagonismen" geprägten sozialen Differenzierung der „Unter"-Schichten sind bislang wissenschaftlich kaum thematisiert worden."

Siehe
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2013/12/rassenhygiene-als-sozialistisches.html

Dienstag, 2. April 2013

Pius XI. und die unvollendete Enzyklika


April, April ....


Der 75 Jahre alte Entwurf der Enzyklika Humani Generis Unitas, Von der Einheit des Menschengeschlechts, 

(Post vom 1. April 2013, "Papst will Enzyklika 'Von der Einheit des Menschengeschlechts' erlassen";
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2013/04/papst-franziskus-will-noch-in-diesem.html)

bleibt weiterhin in der Schublade.

 

_______________




Pius XI. - Der Alleingelassene
von Gwunderi, im Mai 2010
https://sites.google.com/site/piusxideralleingelassene/


Der Papst, der nicht geschwiegen hätte

Im Gegensatz zu seinem Nachfolger hätte Pius XI. sehr wohl seine Stimme zu den Judenverfolgungen (und später zum Holocaust) erhoben, wie er es bereits vor allem 1938, aber auch schon früher mehrfach getan hatte. Hatte er anfangs den Faschismus - wohl vor allem als Bollwerk gegen den Bolschewismus -   befürwortet, so distanzierte er sich gegen Ende seines Pontifikats immer mehr   von der "unseligen Wende" ("ignobile svolta"), von den rassistischen Ideologien Mussolinis und Hitlers. Aber er wurde von "Gegenströmungen" innerhalb der römischen Kurie in seinen Protestbemühungen vielfach behindert und zensuriert, allen voran durch seinen Staatssekretär Eugenio Pacelli, dem späteren Papst Pius XII., der das "gute" Verhältnis zum Dritten Reich nicht  trüben wollte - um keinen Preis.

Immer mehr Historiker weisen in den letzten Jahren auf diesen Kontrast zwischen den beiden Pontifex hin, besonders auch nach der im September 2006  erfolgten Teilöffnung der Vatikanischen Geheimarchive für das Pontifikat Pius'  XI. (1922-1939).

Dabei hatte sich auch Achille Ratti, so der bürgeliche Name Pius' XI., in seinen Jahren als Nuntius in Polen abschätzig über die Juden geäussert, wie David Kertzer in seinem Buch "Die Päpste gegen die Juden" herausstellt; doch auch Kertzer räumt später ein, Pius XI. habe gegen Ende seines Pontifikats seine damalige Haltung aufrichtig bereut. [...]



Ende Juni 1938 empfing Pius XI. den amerikanischen Jesuiten John LaFarge, der bereits ein Buch gegen Rassendiskriminierung in den USA verfasst hatte, in Privataudienz in seiner Sommerresidenz in Castelgandolfo und beauftragte ihn, nachdem er ihn zu strengster Geheimhaltung verpflichtet hatte, mit der Ausarbeitung einer Enzyklika gegen Rassismus und Antisemitismus. Dem völlig überraschten LaFarge, der gerade auf Europareise war und sich eher zufällig in Rom aufhielt, war, "als sei ihm der Felsen des heiligen Petrus auf den Kopf gefallen."  [...]


Auszug aus der unvollendeten Enzyklika



Siehe auch

David W. Southern: John LaFarge and the limits of Catholic interracialism, 1911 – 1963, LSU Press, 1996
http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=uHr7k5iNUi4C&source=gbs_navlinks_s


________


"Gefallen findet Benedikts Nachfolger Pius XI. am Faschistenführer Mussolini, den er schon 1921, als er noch Kardinal Ratti heißt, einen „wundervollen Mann” nennt. „Mussolini macht schnelle Fortschritte”, freut er sich, „und wird mit elementarer Kraft alles niederringen, was ihm in den Weg kommt.” "
http://derhonigmannsagt.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/%E2%80%9Emit-gott-und-den-faschisten%E2%80%9D-videos/

"Der Hitler ist der erste und einzige Staatsmann, der öffentlich gegen die Bolschewisten spricht." Papst Pius XI. im März 1933 (DER SPIEGEL 17 / 2003 / 67)
http://schwarzeliste.orgfree.com/seite37.html


Später dämmerte ihm wohl, welcher Preis damit verbunden war, den Teufel (Bolschewismus) mit Beelzebub (Faschismus) austreiben zu wollen. Er sprach von einer "unseligen Wende" ("ignobile svolta"); s.o.

(Die Webseiten mit den hier aufgeführten Zitaten sind tendenziös und haben z.T. verschwörungstheoretische Inhalte. Angabe von Fundstellen bedeutet nicht eine Unterstützung der Inhalte auf den jeweiligen Webseiten.)

Montag, 1. April 2013

Papst will Enzyklika "Von der Einheit des Menschengeschlechts" erlassen

BITTE DATUM BEACHTEN
PLEASE NOTE THE DATE


75 years are enough!
Pope Franciscus intends to release the Encyclical „Humani Generis Unitas“ which has been in draft stage since 1938, within this year.
„It is time“, he said in his Easter speech.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2013/03/201333055149220298.html


____


Der neue Papst hat in seiner Osteransprache verkuendet:

Der Entwurf fuer die Enzyklika von der Einheit des Menschengeschlechts, der 1938 im Auftrag von Pius XI erstellt wurde, wird nach 75 Jahren jetzt fertiggestellt.

Die paepstliche Enzyklika "Humani Generis Unitas" soll noch in diesem Jahr herauskommen.

http://kurier.at/politik/weltchronik/papst-franziskus-hielt-osteransprache-fuer-den-frieden/7.198.939

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humani_Generis_Unitas
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2011/07/die-idee-von-der-einheit-des.html





Papst Pius XI – Achille Ratti (1857-1939)
Auftraggeber der Enzyklika
 Humani GenerisUnitas
Bild gefunden auf
(Link ist hier ausdruecklich
NUR ALS BILDQUELLE eingestellt)




Papst Franciscus – Jorge Bergoglio (*1936)








Sonntag, 31. März 2013

Kreuzritter "Im Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus"


In the past 200 years we have been in the vanguard of counterrevolution.
(Seit 200 Jahren sind wir in der Vorhut der Gegenrevolution.)
-
Barry Garland, Großmeister des Sovereign Order
of Saint John in Jerusalem - Knights of Malta (OSJ)




„Breiviks Vordenker“ Paul Ray, „selbsternannter Wiederbeleber des Kreuzrittertums“ (Frank Patalong im SPIEGEL), zog sich nach Malta zurueck.  


„Konservative Revolution“ und „Kreuzritternationalismus“: Zum Selbstverstaendnis des Norwegen-Attentaeters
______

Noch einmal Geschichtliches.


Durch die antiquarisch besorgte antisemitische Hetzschrift "The Gravediggers of Russia" aus den 1920er Jahren kam ich auf die - zumindest ideologische - Beziehung zwischen dem Trio Alfred Rosenberg, Otto von Kursell und Dietrich Eckart einerseits und dem russischen Exil-Agitator (Graf) Cherep Spiridovich andererseits. Die Verbindung wurde dadurch ersichtlich, dass ein Kleinverlag in Hollywood (wahrscheinlich verbunden mit fruehen Nazi-Sympathisanten um den Filmautor und Anfuehrer der "Silver Shirts", William Dudley Pelley) auf der Rueckseite des Pamphlets von Rosenberg, Kursell und Eckart fuer das Pamphlet von Spiridovich warb.

Siehe den Post "'Bolschewisten-Fratzen' in der Karikatur":

http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2011/08/bolschewisten-gesichter-das.html
Ueber fruehe Nazi-Sympathisanten in Hollywood siehe auch den Post "McKiernan und das NS-Zitat" auf meinem anderen Blog; hier den Abschnitt ueber die "Murphy Ranch":
http://zettelmaus.blogspot.com/2012/05/was-hat-mckiernan-wirklich-gesagt.html


Auf diese unerwartete Verbindung aufmerksam geworden, stiess ich auf weitere Hintergruende zum Zusammenwachsen eugenischer, antisemitischer und antibolschewistischer Motive in der Zeit zwischen den beiden Weltkriegen. Der Einsatz deutscher Freikorps zur Bekaempfung des Kommunismus/ Bolschewismus auf dem Baltikum (1919) war mit Agitation verbunden, deren Bedeutung fuer die Entstehung des antisemitischen Antibolschewismus einige Aufmerksamkeit verdient.


Interessant ist auch der Hinweis - wenn er denn zutrifft - dass der Einsatz im Baltikum, bei dem (Fürst) Bermondt-Awaloff eine Streitmacht von rund 40.000 deutschen und deutsch-baltischen und rund 10.000 russischen Kaempfern führte, "unter anderem auch von einem obskuren Zweig des
Johanniterordens und von J.P. Morgan jun. finanziell unterstützt" wurde (Wikipedia).
Dazu hatte ich noch weitere Ausfuehrungen gefunden.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pawel_Michailowitsch_Bermondt-Awaloff
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2011/08/bolschewisten-gesichter-das.html

Gibt es eine Traditionslinie zwischen dem "Kreuzritternationalismus", der in der Bloggerszene des "Counterdschihad" und in neuen ultra-nationalen, islamfeindlichen Bewegungen entstanden ist, und dem "Kreuzzug gegen den Kommunismus", der 1919 im Baltikum begann? Einige immer wiederkehrende Muster in der Rhetorik der "Counterdschihadisten" (siehe z.B. Stichwort "Kulturmarxismus" auf diesem Blog) und, rein optisch, die dem Johanniter-/ Malteser-Kreuz aehnlichen Logos von Gruppierungen wie der "English Defense League" und auf Breiviks Pamphlet "2083", lassen daran denken.

Um der Frage, ob es eine solche Traditionslinie gibt, etwas weiter nachzugehen, lese ich gerade auf der Webseite, die in dem Wikipedia-Eintrag zu Bermondt-Awaloff als Quelle fuer das Zitat ueber finanzielle Unterstuetzung durch den Johanniterorden und J.P. Morgan genannt wurde.
"Sovereign Order of Saint John in Jerusalem - Knights of Malta" (OSJ)
http://www.osjknights.com/History-After-Malta.htm

Der Orden bezeichnet sich als katholisch. (Auf der Webseite ist noch ein Bild von Papst Benedikt. Es findet sich u.a. auch ein Anti-Modernitaetsgeluebde von 1910).
Es handelt sich hier offensichtlich um keinen der drei Orden, die bei Wikipedia (deutsch) unter "Johanniter" aufgefuehrt sind (Souveräner Malteserorden - katholisch; Johanniterorden - evangelisch; Order of Saint John - oekumenisch;
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johanniter.) Am ehesten handelt es sich um eine kleine Gruppe ohne Legitimation durch die Allianz der Malteser-/ Johanniterorden, die den Anspruch erhebt, in der historischen Kontinuität des Ordens zu stehen.

Aus Wikipedia zu „Souveräner Malteserorden
(Hervorhebung mit Fettdruck von mir)
‚Der Souveräne Malteserorden (mit vollem Titel: Souveräner Ritter- und
Hospitalorden vom Heiligen Johannes zu Jerusalem, genannt von Rhodos, genannt von Malta) ist eine katholische Ordensgemeinschaft, die im 11. Jahrhundert in Jerusalem gegründet und nach dem Ersten Kreuzzug zusätzlich zu einem geistlichen Ritterorden wurde. Neben der ursprünglicheren Bezeichnung Johanniterorden trat seit der Ansiedlung auf der Insel Malta um 1530 der heute gebräuchliche Name.
[Einschub aus der englischsprachigen Wikipedia, Bezeichnungen in Englisch: The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, auch bekannt als the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), Order of Malta or Knights of Malta; Anm.Blogger]
Völkerrechtlich wird der Orden im Allgemeinen als ein souveränes,
nichtstaatliches Völkerrechtssubjekt betrachtet. Ziel des Ordens ist es, Alte, Behinderte, Flüchtlinge, an tödlichen Krankheiten Erkrankte und Leprakranke – unabhängig von Religion oder Herkunft – weltweit karitativ zu unterstützen. [...]
Der Malteserorden erkennt die in einer Allianz von 1961 unter gegenseitiger Anerkennung zusammengeschlossenen evangelischen Johanniterorden in Deutschland, den Niederlanden (Johanniter Orde in Nederland), Schweden (Johanniterorden i Sverige) und in Großbritannien (Venerable Order of Saint John) als Ritterorden des heiligen Johannes mit „gemeinsamer Geschichte und gemeinsamem Auftrag“ an.“




Graf v.d. Goltz und Prinz Awaloff
http://www.osjknights.com/History-After-Malta.htm

Chicago Daily Tribune Oct. 15, 1919
http://www.osjknights.com/History-After-Malta.htm



























"Im Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus
Erinnerungen von General Fuerst Awaloff
Oberbefehlshaber der deutsch-russischen Westarmee im Baltikum
http://www.osjknights.com/History-After-Malta.htm


Auszuege
http://www.osjknights.com/History-After-Malta.htm


For the past two hundred years we have been
in the vanguard of the Counter Revolution.
            Barry Garland, RN, OSJ
            Grand Master


In 1912 the Order consisted of the Russian Grand Priory in Russia
            and the new American Grand Priory and its subsidiary, the Catholic
            Grand Priory of Russia, which included remnants of the Spanish
            Caballeros Hospitalarios de San Juan Bautista. The Russian Grand
            Priory was composed mainly of Slavic Knights of the Orthodox Faith.
            The American Grand Priory leaders were mostly socially prominent
            Protestant Episcopalians from New York City and Chicago. There was
            also a small group of American descendants of Catholic Celtic
            Jacobites, who were still followers of the old Stuart Pretender to
            the throne of England and Scotland. The Pretender at the time was
            Queen Mary IV of Bavaria, and an army physician named Edgar Erskine
            Hume, OSJ was among those who later considered Mary’s successor,
            Bavarian Crown Prince Rupprecht, as his “rightful sovereign.” The
            American Grand Prior, William Nelson Cromwell, and Dr. Francis C.
            Nicholas had had contact with Spanish Knights of St. John during
            years of preparation work for the American Panama Canal project. [...]
           

American Grand Priory leaders, Nicholas Murray Butler, President of
            Columbia University, Archer Huntington, founder of the Hispanic
            Society of America, William Nelson Cromwell, Wall Street lawyer and
            Francis C. Nicholas, founder of the American International Academy,
            are among those who crafted the American Grand Priory into an
            intelligence organization. Nicholas, a mining engineer and explorer,
            had done Cromwell’s Panama Canal construction feasibility studies.
            He had also done geological research in Central and South America
            for Archer Huntington and Colonel William Lamb, who were supplying
            fuel coal to the Russian Navy. These men wielded significant
            influence in the United States during the late 19th through the mid
            20th centuries.
            Some results of their careers include the founding of the Republic
            of Panama and the successful purchase and construction of the Panama
            Canal. They were also responsible for the founding of the
            Pan-American “Organization of American States” and directly
            influenced the founders of the Central Intelligence Agency. Others
            prominent in the OSJ at this time included John Jacob Astor until
            his death on the Titanic, J. P. Morgan, J P Morgan, Jr. and the
            extended Cornelius Vanderbilt and Chicago Crane families. The
            Mexican White Cross association was promoted by Don Agustin
            Yturbide, OSJ, Pretender to the royal throne of Mexico. [...]


On March 4, 1919 by Order number 24 Colonel Bermondt made the
            Maltese cross breast badge the emblem of his SOSJ army and enameled
            it black in memory of General Graf Keller. High level German
            nationalists backed this re-establishment of the Russian Sovereign
            Imperial Order of St. John of Jerusalem. Among them was General
            Ludendorff who had been Chief of Staff of the German Army during
            WWI. His chief intelligence officer Major Walter Nicholai was also
            involved. The Protector of the Order was the legitimate heir to the
            Russian throne, Grand Duke Cyril Vladimirovich. Grand Duke Cyril
            continued to finance the SOSJ venture with the help of the American
            Grand Priory. Prince Awaloff and Grand Duke Cyril planned to join
            with German forces to drive the Bolsheviks out of the Baltic. This
            idea to cooperate with Germany was unique to these Knights of St.
            John who believed that Russian-German cooperation was the only way
            to rid the world of the Bolsheviks.

            In 1919 Colonel Prince Pavel Awaloff-Bermondt, supported by the
            Johanniter Orden, the Romanoff Pretender Grand Duke Cyril, and
            American financier J. P. Morgan, Jr., OSJ, became Commander in chief
            of the Russian Imperial Army. He led the SOSJ and apparently
            Johanniter-Orden plan, financed through attorney W. N. Cromwell,
            OSJ, American Grand Prior, to clear the Bolsheviks from the Baltic
            and to set up a pro-German government. Most of the officials of what
            became known in the Fall of 1919 as the West Russian Government were
            members of the OSJ. Prince Awaloff recorded much of this information
            in his memoirs which he wrote in 1925 in Hamburg, Germany.



            SOVEREIGN ORDER OF SAINT JOHN OF JERUSALEM
            History and Lineage Charts Since 1797
            I. INTRODUCTION
            II. THE SOSJ PRESERVES ITSELF BY DEFENDING MONARCHY
            III. THE INTERNATIONAL WHITE CROSS OF THE SOSJ
            IV. IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST INTERNATIONAL ANARCHISTS THE SOSJ ADDS AN AMERICAN GRAND PRIORY
            V. THE AMERICAN GRAND PRIORY VENTURES INTO FOREIGN SERVICE
            VI. REVOLUTIONARIES WITHIN THE SOSJ CONTRIBUTE TO ANARCHY
            VII. THE KORNILOV AFFAIR
            VIII. THE SOSJ RESPONDS TO THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
            IX. COUNT KELLER, PRINCE AWALOFF AND GRAND DUKE CYRIL LEAD THE ORDER OF ST. JOHN AGAINST THE BOLSHEVIKS
            X. THE LINEAGE OF THE SOVEREIGN ORDER OF SAINT OF JERUSALEM
            XI. THE BALTIC CAMPAIGN OF THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA
            XII. THE AMERICAN GRAND PRIORY JOINS THE FIGHT AGAINST THE COMMUNIST INTERNATIONALE
            XIII. GERMAN NATIONALISTS NURTURE THE WHITE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT-IN-EXILE
            XIV. THE SOSJ GOVERNMENT IS MOVED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
            XV. THE EXILED ROMANOV FAMILY DEFEATS ITSELF
            XVI. THE SOSJ SUPPORTS FASCISM TO DEFEAT BOLSHEVISM
            XVII. LIBERALS USE THE AMERICAN COURTS TO SILENCE AMERICAN ANTI-COMMUNISTS
            XVIII. THE ORDER ENTRENCHES ITSELF FOR THE COLD WAR
            XIX. THE MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND KNIGHTS OF THE SOSJ DEFEND AGAINST COMMUNISM
            XX. THE POST-WAR GERMAN ORDER OF ST. JOHN ABANDONS THE SOSJ TO IMPROVE ITS IMAGE
            XXI. THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA STAND AGAINST HUMANISTS WITHIN THE CHURCH
            XXII. THE HISTORIC MISSION OF THE SOSJ




 THE GRAND MASTERS OF THE ORDER
            2008-Present 78th Prince Grand Master Barry Garland, RN
            1991-2008 77th Prince Grand Master Dr. John L. Grady, MD
            1983-1991 General Benjamin von Stahl, President of the Sovereign Council
            1976-1983 76th Prince Grand Master Don Roberto Paterno
            1966-1976 75th Prince Grand Master Crolian Edelen
            1962-1966 LGM Admiral Felix Count von Luckner
            1960-1962 LGM Colonel Paul Cassagnac
            1956-1960 LGM F. Graf von Zeppelin
            1954-1956 LGM Scipio Baron von Engelhardt-Schnellenstein
            1934-1954 74th Prince Grand Master General Pavel Awaloff-Bermondt
            1913-1934 73rd Grand Master Grand Duke Alexander Michaelovich
            1894-1918 Czar Nicholas II, Protector of the SOSJ
            1881-1894 Czar Alexander III, Protector of the SOSJ
            1855-1881 Czar Alexander II, Protector of the SOSJ
            1825-1855 Czar Nicholas I, Protector of the SOSJ
            1805-1825 Czar Alexander I, Protector of the SOSJ
            1803-1805 72nd Prince Grand Master John Baptist di Tommasi
            1801-1803 LGM Field Marshall Count Soltikoff
            1798-1801 71st Grand Master Czar Paul I
            1048-1798Historical List of Grand Masters



__________________

 
 
Interessantes Protokoll von einem Treffen des „Sovereign Order of Jerusalem -Knights of Malta“ (OSJ) im Waldorf-Astoria in New York am 24. Juni 1926:
http://sovereignorderofsaintjohnofjerusalem.com/archpdf/June_1926.pdf
Bei dem Treffen wurde ueber die Aufnahme von 25 neuen Mitgliedern enschieden, darunter Lord Alfred Douglas (!) und Prinz Rupprecht von Bayern.
Ein Graf von Moltke schlug vor, der Aufnahme gemaess der vorgelegten Liste zuzustimmen, was auch geschah. Der Vorsitzende liess sich besonders ausfuehrlich ueber die Ergebnisse der Ahnenforschung zur Abstammung eines Kandidaten mit ueberaus noblen Vorfahren aus (bei dem dies wohl nicht so offensichtlich war), Charles L. Thourot Pichel. - Pichel war ein fanatischer Anti-Kommunist (s. u. Artikel von Stair Sainty) und Nazi-Sympathisierer (siehe z.B. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3915&st=45 )

Zu Lord Alfred Douglas siehe auch
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2013/03/auf-gut-deutsch-und-plain-english.html ;
http://guttmensch.blogspot.com/2011/12/hate-speech-hassrede.html

_____________




Grandiose Elchklubs:

Selbsternannte „Johannes-Orden“

Dieser Abschnitt bezieht sich auf den Bericht
"The self-styled Orders of Saint John" von Guy Stair Sainty (1991, mit Bearbeitungen 1996-2000)


Im November und Dezember 1976 veroeffentlichte der Heilige Stuhl im Osservatore Romano Erklaerungen, die klarstellten, dass der sogenannte "Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem" nichts zu tun hat mit dem historischen, paepstlich anerkannten „Sovereign Military Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta“. Bei einer Bestandsaufnahme wurden, nach dem Bericht von Guy Stair Sainty (s.u.; mit Link und Wiedergabe von Auszuegen) seinerzeit 16 selbsternannte „Johannes-Orden“ aufgefuehrt.
[Inzwischen sind es nach Auskunft des „Ausschuss fuer die St. Johannes-Orden“ 24, kleine „folkloristische“ Gruppen nicht mitgezaehlt; die Zahl sei in den letzten Jahren weitgehend stabil geblieben.

Etliche davon nahmen fuer sich in Anspruch, aus einer 1908 in den USA gegruendeten Nachfolgerorganisation des russischen Grosspriorats hervorgegangen zu sein.
US Praesident Ronald Reagan setzte sich mit Erfolg dafuer ein, dass der „Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Malta“ (SMHOM) 1994 Beobachterstatus bei den Vereinten Nationen bekam (wie z.B. das Internationale Komitee des Roten Kreuzes). Damit wurden die Moeglichkeiten des SMHOM, mit staatlicher Unterstuetzung gegen selbsternannte „Johannes-Orden“ vorzugehen, gestaerkt.
In dem erstmals 1991 verfassten Bericht des Ordens-Experten Guy Stair Sainty wimmelt es nur so von echten und falschen Adeligen im Exil, die selbsternannten Orden „Glaubwuerdigkeit“ verleihen. Es geht um Titel, Eitelkeiten, Einflussnahme, Geld.
Es geht natuerlich auch um die formale und inhaltliche Abgrenzung der „echten“ von den „selbsternannten“ Johanniter-Orden; eine immerwaehrende Herausforderung. Personelle Ueberschneidungen zwischen „echten“ und „selbsternannten“ Johanniter-Orden sind von der Ordens-Allianz (unter massgeblicher Leitung des SMHOM) schon lange nicht mehr zugelassen; es gab sie aber in der Vergangenheit (Beispiel Felix Graf von Luckner).  

Ein Graf Luckner (Hubertus von Metthingh Graf von Luckner) war übrigens auch wieder dabei, als Thilo Sarrazins Berater Friedrich Thelen (dankend erwähnt in DSSA) am 25.06. 2011 zum neuen Ehrenkommendator des Johanniterordens ernannt wurde.

Auf der Webseite Nobility News ist auch sonst manches Interessante nachzulesen, z.B. wurde der Jahresball 2012 der „Russian Nobility Association“ angekündigt. Es gibt viele Hinweise darauf, dass Nachfahren aus Königshäusern von Ländern, in denen die Monarchie längst abgeschafft wurde, sich immer noch über ihren Platz in der hypothetischen Thronfolge definieren.


Antisemitisch-antibolschewistische Denkmuster werden in Kreisen „selbsternannter“ Johanniter-Orden z. T. bis heute bewahrt. 


"The self-styled Orders of Saint John " [1] (Part I)

©Guy Stair Sainty (1991, revisions 1996-2000)


When the machinations of one of the self-styled "orders" are exposed [...], there is an inevitable reflection on the name of Saint John which may injure the recognized Orders. The latter have made a concerted effort to publicly disassociate themselves from these organizations and, to this end, have formed a False Orders Committee which constantly updates the shifting allegiances between the different groups and attempts to warn the general public against them. They have been aided in this by the Holy See which, on 28 November 1976 and 1 December 1976, published statements in the Osservatore Romano, making it clear that the so-called "Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem" was nothing to do with the Sovereign Military Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta.
Chaffanjon and Galimard Flavigny devoted an entire chapter to the self-styled Orders of Malta, listing sixteen organizations claiming to be Orders of Malta or Orders of Saint John. Many of these bodies were somehow connected with an institution purportedly "re-founded" in 1908 and professing to be the successor of the Russian Grand Priory [...]


Almost without exception, these enterprises are riven by factionalism and, as one individual began to resent the leadership position assumed by another (particularly when the claim to such position was so often based on a dubious claim to a high ranking noble title), schisms would occur and rival groups reform around another "Grand Master".
Despite the fact that generations of impoverished Europeans bearing both genuine and false titles have come to the United States and Canada to improve their fortunes with nothing other than their social pretensions to assist them, Americans seem peculiarly susceptible to accepting the most bizarre and unfounded claims by pseudo-princes and dukes whose claims to such titles could be verified in most major reference libraries. [...]
Fortunately, in two recent cases brought against self-styled Saint John Orders in US Federal Courts, the American Judiciary has shown itself willing to penalize these groups [...]


In the first of these cases, Alhadeff v. Georg, 30 November 1983, the Court decided in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant (Robert M.N.G. Bassaraba von Brancovan-Prince Khimchiachvili) who had supplied the plaintiff with a "passport" and made him a "knight of Malta" for which he had charged $20,000.


In the second case, W.D. X. et ux. v. Markovics, 27/28 February 1989, the Court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the principal      defendant, Dr Ivan Markovics and his "Order", finding as a fact that the      defendant had deliberately defrauded the plaintiffs by leading them to      believe they were joining the genuine Catholic Order.[...]


Since the decision in these two cases, then serving President of the United States Ronald Reagan was invested with the Collar of Merit of the Ordine al Merito Melitense of the SMHOM by the Grand Master himself at a dinner in New York, providing added evidence of the recognition accorded to the SMHOM by the United States of America. In 1994 the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Malta was admitted to Observer status at the United Nations among the "intergovernmental" organizations, which include the International Committee of the Red Cross. This may entitle the SMHOM to demand protection from the state authorities in the various countries where self-styled "Orders of St John" are flourishing. The Court in the Markovics Case specifically recognized the legitimacy of the SMHOM and the Alliance Orders as the true historic successors of the crusader Order of Saint John. The self-styled Saint John "orders" will no longer get away with pretending that they are historically connected with the crusader Order; furthermore they and their officers now run the risk of criminal prosecution.
It is the deliberate intention of the organizers of most of the self-styled Saint John or Malta Orders to confuse their organizations with the name and work of the genuine, recognized Orders. An article in the New York Observer (October 1993) entitled "Dungeons and Dragons for Grown-ups: Knights of Malta Joust with 'Impostor'" by Robin Pogrebin muddled the name and activities of a completely spurious body headed by a self-proclaimed "bishop", Lorenzo Michel de Valitch and the SMHOM [...] Among those named as having been recruited into Valitch's group was the late J. Seward Johnson, describing the ridiculous ceremony and remarking that Mr Johnson's daughter depicted the organization her father had joined as "a glorified Elk's Club", a comment at which the Elk's might justifiably have protested.


The origins and ultimate abolition and suppression of the Catholic Grand      Priory of Russia and the (non-Catholic) Grand Priory of Russia have been    discussed earlier and examined in detail by the late Frà Cyril Toumanoff, whose work was cited by the Court as an authoritative source in the Markovics Case. The so-called "hereditary commanderies" of the Russian Grand Priories, held by proponents of the modern "revivals" as evidence of their continue existence, were no more hereditary than the other still extant jus patronatus commanderies of the Order, which can only by invested in an heir who has already been received as a member of the Sovereign Military Order. The descendants of the founders of Russian (or any other) commanderies, all of which had been legally suppressed, cannot claim to be the successors to such commanderies, even had they been admitted to membership of the SMHOM, since a commandery of the Order of Malta exists as real property and not as an honorific title. If the properties of the commandery have disappeared or been confiscated, the commandery itself ceases to subsist.[...]
[I]ndeed the petty quarrels and grandiose pretensions of these groups may be seen as a dramatic contrast to the lives of those who serve in the ranks of the legitimate Orders of Saint John. In outlining the histories of these "orders", I initially followed the enumeration established by Fra' Norbert Kinsky when, in 1982, he charted the complex connections between these various groups, some of which are bitter rivals while others have combined to form an Anti-Alliance, the counterpart of the Alliance of the recognized Orders. [...]


Two works, both produced by the partisans of self-styled "Orders of Saint     John", have been particularly useful in studying the various rumps and     schisms among them: The Order of St John of Jerusalem of Malta: A study of     its relations and developments from the fall of Hompesch; its revival in     various forms in our times, by Harrison Smith, PhD, published in Malta by the "Progress Press" in 1964; and White Cross: Story of the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, by Robert W.Y. Formhals, published in 1978. These and other such publications have attempted to buttress their own pretensions to legitimacy by stating that the Sovereign Military Order of Malta is a recent Papal invention founded in 1802/3. The proponents of the Russian survival make persistent pseudo-historical claim that the Russian Grand Priories survived the legal suppression of the Commanderies by Emperor Alexander I and his decision to refuse further admissions to the membership. Several "historians" of these bodies do not hesitate to deceive their readers by claiming that the Papal decision to elect Tommasi established a new order, in opposition to the Russian Grand Priories [...]


The early history of the Most Venerable Order is compared by these authors to that of the modern so-called "Russian" revivals although, unlike the former, the first members of these 20th century inventions were not admitted by legitimate members of the Catholic Order but simply assumed the style of knight. It has frequently been mis-stated that the British Monarch is merely "protector" of the Most Venerable Order, in an attempt to parallel the British Royal Charter with that purportedly issued by the late King Peter of Yugoslavia. Since the reign of Queen Victoria  the Monarch has enjoyed the title Sovereign Head, the title now held by H.M. Queen Elizabeth II, while her title of "patron" merely applies to her separate role in the Saint John Ambulance Association.


[Examples of] [t]he self-styled Orders [...] (1) (The Shickshinny Order) The proponents of the survival of the "Russian" Grand Priories have claimed that, on 10 January 1908, a certain William Lamb, sometime Colonel and purported descendent of a General Ivan Lamb [...], who had been apparently received into the original Russian Grand Priory by Czar Paul, held a meeting at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City, to form the "Grand Priory of America of the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem". The claim is made that eight Russian noblemen, purported descendants of     so-called "hereditary commanders", were present at this occasion. [...]
At a meeting held on 30 December 1910 an "Association of the knights of   Malta" was allegedly constituted [...]; this was supposedly to become the      "Association of the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem". It was      claimed that the Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich of Russia (both cousin     and brother-in-law of Czar Nicholas II) accepted the Grand Magistery in     person in either 1913 [14] or on 1 September 1914. The Grand Duke      Alexander was a serving rear-admiral in the Imperial Russian Navy and, as      war broke out with Germany on 1 August 1914, he was unlikely to have been      involved in such an irrelevant charade at this time.


The Grand Duke Alexander died in 1933 and his purported successors as head     of the American continuation of this group (according to the history produced by Charles Pichel, see below), calling themselves "Lieutenants of the Grand Master", were (possibly, although this has not been proved by any contemporary document) William Sohier Bryant (1933-1951), Scipio Engelhardt alias baron von Engelhardt-Schnellenstein (1951-1955), Frederick, Count von Zeppelin (1956-1960), and Paul de Granier de  Cassagnac (1960-1962). In 1953 the name was changed to the "Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem Inc" [17] and the headquarters transferred to Shickshinny, Pennsylvania, the residence of its "Grand Chancellor" and general factotum, Charles Louis Thourot-Pichel, in 1956. Pichel was not only an adherent of the Old Catholic Church but a fanatical anti-Communist who apparently actually came to believe that the SMHOM was a nineteenth century Papal foundation and that his organization alone represented the true continuation of the ancient crusader Order. He became increasingly eccentric (forming the Galactic Powers Task Force described above) and, in 1969, announced that he was forming the "Maltese Cross Legionaries" to combat a secret alliance between the Holy See and the government of Malta to hand the island over to the Soviets. In 1967 Pichel became allied with a group of Catholic traditionalists who denied the authority of the US bishops and, in 1969, accused the Jesuits of manipulating the Papacy for their own ends. He also became associated with the "alternative medicine" movement, sponsoring nature cures and promoting what he described as "Cosmic Energy". After the numerous divisions and quarrels among his adherents, his group ultimately fragmented and he died in very distressing circumstances in 1982 aged ninety-two.
In 1962 Granier had attempted to depose Pichel from his executive role but     this backfired and Granier was himself overthrown, setting up his own "Order" (see below, 3). Granier's successor, effectively controlled by Pichel, was a certain Count Felix von Luckner (1962-1966). The next defection from this group occurred in the same year [...]
It is unclear which of the various groups now owns or controls the Shickshinny foundation and in 1981 the president of the corporation was a certain Salvatore T. Messineo [...] The "grand prior" of Europe of this group was a self-styled "count" Thorbjorn Wiklund, from Sweden, and other officers    included Per-Axel Atterbom (Secretary-General, Europe), Major John F.  Graham (Secretary), Colonel Benjamin von Stahl, and some twenty-one "priors of priories".
Another purported continuation of the Pichel Order can be found in Benton, Tennessee, run by two schismatic Catholic priests, one of whom was ordained by the late Archbishop Lefebvre and who maintain the Tridentine rite. Unfortunately these two have somehow claimed that they are Pichel's heirs of what they claim to be the legitimate Order [...]. Messineo and his associates took the precaution of making the cross and arms a trademark", and as they were a legal corporation this was duly registered; a challenge by the American Association of the SMHOM to overturn the registration was unsuccessful and Messineo has enforced his ownership against another self-styled Order, that headed by the notorious Dr Grady. [...]
In a letter addressed to Harrison Smith, Mr Edelen, Pichel's closest associate for many years, wrote (on January 22, 1980: "My problem with the history is    that all seems to be false from 1908 to 1932 as published by Pichel. [...]

The apparent closest successor of the Shickshinny fantasy today is a body     now particularly active in Canada, see under 11A, although several others     among the self-styled Saint John Orders were formed from schisms within      this and other groups.
A group still awarding the cross of Saint John was purportedly formed in Paris on June 24, 1928 by a group of Russian exiles in Paris as the "Union of Hereditary Commanders and Knights of the Grand Priory of Russia of the Order of Saint John of Jerusalem" and looked to the Grand Duke Alexander as their head with the title of "Protector". By 1929 this body was named the Association Philanthropique Russe des déscendants des commandeurs héréditaires de l'Ordre Souverain de Malte" and on 21st September 1929, the Grand Duke along with several descendants of hereditary commanders (Prince Demidoff, Count Stoltykopff, Prince Bariatinsky and Count Oulsoufief) asked Baron Michael Taube to "solliciter l'autorisation du Grand Magistere de l'Ordre Souverain de Saint-Jean de Jerusalem à Rome de reconstituer la branche Russe de l'Ordre." This request was rejected by the Grand Master, as it was canonically impossible to establish a non-Catholic Grand Priory within the Order.  Since the Grand Duke's death in 1933, two other members of the Romanov dynasty have been associated with the perfectly legitimate "association of descendants of hereditary commanders;"  the late Grand Duke Andrew Wladimirovich (uncle of the late Grand Duke Wladimir, head of the Romanov Dynasty), elected in 1933,  and later the most junior member of the dynasty, the late Prince Vassili Alexandrovich.
The transformation of this from an association of descendants, into an    association of "hereditary commanders" and then a body which actually      admitted new members and knights, calling itself the Russian Grand Priory,     however, did not legally recreate or revive the former non-Catholic Russian Grand Priory. [...] Rev Michael Foster [...] cites a letter from the Grand Duke Kyrill to the Grand Duke Andrew asking the latter to look after this group.     There is no evidence that either Kyrill or Wladimir intended to recognize this body as an "Order of Chivalry," but rather as a group descended from the members of the former Grand Priory - a "Union of Descendants" as it    continued to be styled. [...]
 In 1977 Count Nicholas A. Bobrinskoy [...] established himself as Grand Prior of "The Sovereign Order of the Orthodox Knights Hospitaller of Saint John of Jerusalem - Former Russian Grand Priory of the Order of Malta in Saint Petersburg" which he stated to be under the "High Protection" of the late Prince Vassili of Russia. Count Bobrinskoy, then living in New York [...] listed a number of "hereditary commanders" on his stationary and even attempted to be accredited to the United Nations, but this came to nothing. Among the "hereditary commanders" of this body are several Russian nobleman who apparently credit the claims to historical continuity of the "Russian Grand Priories" despite the expert analysis of Fra' Cyril Toumanoff [...].
A nephew of Count Nicholas Bobrinskoy, also called Count Nicholas Bobrinskoy, was until recently Prior of Russia and since his death has been succeeded by his son, Count Alexei; Prince Michael Romanov (alias Prince Michael of Russia, morganatic son of the late Prince Andrew of Russia) is now "Protector" of the Order. This body also claims the protection of the Patriarch of Moscow, who has conferred his patronage as this Order has done some charitable work in Russia, but His Holiness does not claim that this patronage gives any legal validity to the body's claims to be an "Order of Knighthood". This is the most "respectable" of the self-styled Saint John Orders. It has also formed relationships with several other branches of "self-styled" Saint John orders, which have now acknowledged Bobrinskoy as "Grand Prior"; these bodies have permitted a more honest appraisal of the claims of the self-styled Orders, although sticking to their claim that the Grand Priory survived as an autonomous and independent Grand Priory during the last century of the Russian Empire.


(2) Independent of the Russian foundation is the "Sovereign Order of the      Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem of Denmark" or "Ordo Domus Hospitalis      Sancti Joannis Hyerosolomitani", founded on 31 August 1934 on the basis      that the Order had never been abolished in Denmark. [...]
Without the recognition or patronage of the Danish Crown or Government either, it cannot be considered to be a Danish Order, merely a private association which has adopted the name of a genuine Order of Chivalry. This group apparently denies that it is an "Order of Chivalry", stating that it needs    neither the recognition of the SMHOM, because it is ecumenical, nor the    Danish Crown and explains its use of the name "Sovereign" because "it is      not directly subordinated to any ecclesiastical or temporal authority". It     claims to be registered as a charity [...]. It apparently acquired Sostrup Castle in 1954 (it is not known whether it still owns this), which was converted into a Convent in 1955, and claims to have "commanderies" and associated groups in Sweden (a "Priory" of Saint Erik established in 1974), Germany, Italy, Spain, Canada, USA, Costa Rica (this group has set itself up independently as the      "Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem in the Americas") and Venezuela. [...] The late Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark (who died in 1981) was      associated with this group as "Prior of the Metropolitan Priory of Saint Ansgarius" (and also sometime "Grand Chancellor") and it claims to have made some contributions to worthy causes; most recently it was closely associated with the purchase and renovation of a hospital in Gram. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the legitimate Johanniter Order in Sweden, nor the commandery of the Johanniter Order in Finland. [...]
(2A) Deriving indirectly from (2) is a "Grand Priory of Dacia or Denmark",    otherwise called the "Ecclesiastical Knightly Order of Malta of Saint John of Jerusalem, Priory of Saint Andrew, as it was first styled when formed on April 10, 1939. The first "prior" was a certain Prebend Wenck von Wenckheim (1939-1957), who loosely associated his group with the Union of Russian Commanders. [...]
(2B) Another Danish "Order" was set up on 24 June 1946 by a certain "count" Paul Mikhailovich Bermondt, who also assumed the title "prince Avaloff-Bermondt". This organization had originated in 1920 as the "Sovereign Imperial Russian Chivalric Order of Malta" (Souveraner kaiserliche-russischer Malteser-ritter-orden) with a black Maltese cross as its badge (Bermondt had acquired these as military surplus). Bermondt and his associates (former Russian or Baltic officers who had fought the Soviets in the 1919-1920 civil war) first placed themselves under the authority of the Grand Duke Alexander (see 1 above) and, following the Grand Duke's death in 1933, elected the new Head of the Imperial Dynasty, the Grand Duke Cyril, to be his successor - unfortunately for them Grand Duke Cyril declined this dubious honor. In 1951 Bermondt formed an association with another self-styled Danish Priory formed by a Danish architect named Carl Christensen who succeeded him as Prior. The more recent survivors of this body were for a while in partnership with Pierre     du Chelas (see 3) and Christensen's successor was a Mr Carl Wilhelm Lehman    until 1975 and then Mr Ove Petersen. In 1984 a substantial group of the members joined 2 above.
(2C) A break away group from one of the above was incorporated on 12 March  1954 by Jens Ole Rostock, alias "Count of Hermosa", as the "Sovereign Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem in Denmark", and Rostock, a well-regarded biologist, became "Grand Prior" with "Episcopal and princely" rank. According to Chairoff, priories were established in Oslo (Saint Hallvard), Barcelona (Saint George) and Caracas (Saint Barjal) and an investiture was held in Geneva on 28 January 1982 when twenty-seven would-be knights were admitted after payment of a fee. Mr Erick af Lindenstjerna (actually Matthiesen) was at one time head of a Danish Saint John Order of which Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark was briefly associated; this group may have been connected with (2B).
(2D) Separated from (2) in 1993 is the "Autonoma Prioratet Sancti Iohannis      Baptistae, Riddarbröder af St Johannes af Jerusalems Hospital", a Swedish    "Johanniter Order" unrecognized by the Alliance. Its Prior is the Rev Ulf     Berwill and the Secretary Thor, Baron von Rahden.

(3) In 1962 Paul de Granier de Cassagnac formed an important new connection with the unfortunate exiled King Peter II of Yugoslavia, then living in reduced circumstances in the United States. Despite the fact that the Order of Saint John had never had a Yugoslavian membership and that the Karageorgevich dynasty had no historic connections with the Order of Saint John, King Peter was persuaded in 1962 to declare this "Order" to be under his "High Hereditary Protection". Granier formed a French branch of this group, the "Ordre Souverain de St-Jean de Jerusalem, chevaliers de Malte" or "Chevaliers hospitaliers O.S.J." which had little success,  however, since France has very strict laws regarding Orders of Chivalry, and King Peter detached himself from Granier to set up his own group. In 1965 Granier resigned the "Grand Magistery" to King Peter as a gesture of reconciliation, but the two soon fell out and King Peter took his organization under his own control [...], with a Mr Otto Schobert.
On Granier now resumed the title of "grand master" once again, retaining it until his death in 1967. With Granier's death the "Grand Magistery" of his group was assumed by Mr Carol Hohenzollern, ex-Lambrino, son of King Carol II of Roumania by his unrecognized wife [...] Zizi Lambrino, who styled himself "Prince Carol of Roumania". Prince Carol fell out with some of Granier's associates and set up his own group [...]


3A) In 1968 Prince Carol set himself up independently as head of a separate "Order". The organizers behind this group were Robert Baden von Badische [...], Eimi Eisenstatter styled "Henry Erdesz", Sidney Garber and Frary (von) Blomberg. The headquarters were established in UN Plaza and they admitted many non-Christians and appointed women members both knights and dames. According to Formhals candidates were paying as much as $5000 for membership and $25,000 for the grand cross (in 1969!).
It is claimed that they received a charter from King Peter II of Yugoslavia in 1969 and a renewal of this in 1970, purportedly signed by the King when he was in extremis in hospital in Chicago. Prince Carol broke with this group fairly soon and apparently began to award this "Order" from a base in Europe, founding his own "Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta", in Rome in 1968/69 but was unable to have significant success recruiting members. His son, styled Prince Paul of Roumania, is now actively engaged in Roumania, promoting his claim to be a member of the Roumanian royal family, but is not believed to have any connectio with a self-styled Saint John Order..

(4) Otto Adrian Schobert (or Schubert), alias "Baron de Choibert" had been associated with Pichel and, in 1961, was appointed the latter's "Observer" at the United Nations. Energetic protests by the SMHOM led to this gentleman's name being withdrawn from the list of representatives of unofficial organizations to which the UN issued entry passes and news bulletins and Schobert soon fell out with Pichel. Eisenstatter, Ernst Jochen and Michael Gordon, on 18 May 1964 incorporated the "Sovereign Order of the Hospitallers of Saint John of Jerusalem - knights of Malta - O.S.J. Inc" in New York, "to solicit, collect and otherwise raise funds in order that Society may make grants of money and/or equipment to duly authorized hospitals and other agencies of charitable endeavor in any part of the world ... in furtherance of the humanitarian tasks and endeavors of the Ancient Knightly military religious Order of the Hospitallers of Saint John the Baptist, founded in 1048 in Jerusalem". While not directly associated with this incorporation, King Peter was apparently persuaded to give it his patronage as "Protector" (although he was at the same time giving his protection to another, rival group), and it had widespread success in recruiting members in the late 1960's, since King Peter had considerable personal prestige as a formerly reigning Monarch. This      corporation was continued under different management [...] and in 1989 the plaintiff in the Markovics case obtained a $40,000 judgment against it.


(4A) Directly connected with the above was the now independent "King Peter" group, combining rumps of 1, 3 and 4, of which King Peter appointed Edelen "Grand Chancellor" and, on 13 March 1965, himself became "Grand Master". [38] The bulk of the membership came from a group based in Pittsburgh (under Franklin West) which was the successor of an earlier Masonic organization. The Formhals group (see below) now united itself under King Peter, briefly creating the largest of the self-styled Saint John Orders. On 15 February 1967 the King himself broke with the parent group and dismissed West (who died the following October), changing the name of his organization to the "Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, the Hospitallers, Knights of Malta". Within months there was a  further schism with a rump branch setting itself up under Prince Belosselsky-Belozersky as "Lieutenant-grand Master" on 9 January 1968 but this problem was settled the following September and the King recognized as "Grand Master" by the rebels.
Shortly afterwards, following an awkward meeting between the King and the    Cardinal Archbishop of New York, the King ordered that the word "Sovereign" be dropped from the name and his own title was changed from "Grand Master" to "Royal Head", as he wished to distance himself from the increasingly embarrassing feuds between members of his "Saint John Order". [...]
In June 1970 King Peter's principal aide-de-camp, General Melitchovitch, stated that the King had completely broken all connection with every so-called "Order of Saint John" and confirmed that any "protection" that he may have extended to such organizations was permanently revoked. [...]


The unfortunate King having contracted a serious kidney ailment then spent two months in hospital, leading ultimately to his death on 3 November, during      which period he was frequently visited by the representatives of various  rumps of his "Order", several of whom were later to claim that they alone      represented the legitimate continuation of the group he had founded.
The issue of "recognition" remains an ongoing source of contention; the King Peter followers state that the King was received at Saint James's Palace by H.R.H. Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester, then Grand Prior of the Most Venerable Order of Saint John [... in] 1965 and the King was purportedly given the decorations of a Bailiff Grand Cross of the Most Venerable Order, while H.R.H. supposedly accepted the same distinction from King Peter. [...]
While the Duke may have wished to appear gracious to H.M., it would not have been the first time that the proponent of an unrecognized Order attempted to     gain recognition by conferring their decoration on a member of the British   Royal Family. [...]
Any Yugoslavian connection with these groups purportedly under the protection of the late King Peter has been once again disavowed and condemned by the present Head of the Karageorgevich family, Crown Prince Alexander of Yugoslavia, in a February 992 letter addressed to the Episcopalian Bishop of San Francisco. This reads (in part) "....As the only son and heir of His Majesty the late King Peter II .... I can state categorically that none of the various bodies claiming to function under a "Charter" purportedly granted by my late father have any validity. [...] I do not recognize the validity of any "Charter" purportedly issued to organizations misusing the name "Order of Saint John". Furthermore, junior members of the Royal House of Yugoslavia do not have any legal right to act in the name of the Royal House". Copies of this letter were sent to H.R.H. the Duke of Gloucester, Grand Prior of Saint John, His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Most Rev Bishop Edmond Browning, Presiding Episcopalian Bishop. In a letter to this author dated January 27th, 1992, Crown Prince Alexander wrote "the whole affair was a sad period in my late father's life ..... unfortunately my late uncle, Prince Andrej,, picked up the pieces upon my father's death and got deeply involved. [...] As      head of the Serb and Yugoslav Royal Family and future King, I do not    recognize or authorize the use of any connections to my dynasty by these    orders set up in the United States and Belgium. ... Prince Andrej's son is acting without my permission and I am not pleased".
The publication of The Orders of Saint John by this author, named a number of those associated with the San Francisco Commandery. It was apparent to     the author that this group sincerely believed in the worth of their charitable efforts but did not want to face the true facts about the origins of the body with which they had become associated. The author received a letter dated January 21st, 1992, from a Mr Richard D. Murray, "Regent O.S.J.", written from his home, the "Palais de Medart, of which he enclosed a photograph revealing it to be a grandiose classical style house situated in a prosperous Ohio suburb. The letter paper, bearing the logo "H.R.H. Prince Andrej of Yugoslavia, Grand Master O.S.J." (without mentioning that he had died) politely suggested I obtain an apologia for the "Order" [..] In response to this author's reply to Dr Murray, a vitriolic attack followed in which the latter insulted Crown Prince Alexander, stating that "God is now not looking favorably on Alexander's action" (one may legitimately question by what authority he   was able to know the mind of the Almighty), and continued by stating that  Czar Paul created hereditary commanderies "and their descendants are listed in the Almanacs of the Imperial Court throughout the 19th century until the Zionist (sic) controlled Russian Revolution. It may interest you to know that out of the present situation in Russia there is to be a military coup from which a new ruler of Russia is to emerge..... watch for that coup this summer" (he was right about the coup, although it failed  and led to the new Russia under President Yeltsin). He enclosed a copy of a bizarre book entitled "The Harlot and the Scarlet Beast" an anti-Semitic diatribe which repeated the La Rouche allegations of an international conspiracy of which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was a part, along with Queen Elizabeth II, to hand over the island of Malta to the Soviets. One cannot help but question why these ravings did not arouse the suspicions of the respectable Californians seduced into believing the fantasy history claimed by this "Order". The Secretary-General of the Grand Priory of the Americas of this body was named as being Klaus H. E. Priebe, of Vancouver, BC, Canada.
In recognition of his determination to disassociate himself from these self-styled "orders", Crown Prince Alexander has received the grand cross with gilt star of the Order Pro Merito Melitense of the SMHOM (his uncle, Prince Tomislav, is a member of the Most Venerable Order) and, more recently, the dignity of Bailiff Grand cross of Honor and Devotion "ad honorem". Crown Prince Alexander, in a letter addressed to Grand Master de Mojana dated 14 August 1979, has stated that "the pretension to be under the protection of the Royal House of Yugoslavia .... is totally false" and appointed a personal representative to ensure that in the future all such organizations "usurping the name pertaining to the Sovereign Order, and pretending to be under the protection of the Royal House of Yugoslavia" would be branded as false. [...
]




Ergaenzungen folgen in der Kommentarfunktion